| |
Bet-Nahrain Forum
Re: Proof Mar Aprim Didn't Have and Affair! There Goes Your Argument!
Posted By: Michael B (c-24-12-220-172.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
In Response To: Re: Proof Mar Aprim Didn't Have and Affair! There Goes Your Argument! (ShamiramDaniali)
Date: Monday, 22 May 2006, at 1:45 p.m.
Hi, thanks for the questions.
Firstly, Mar APrim was not "proven" to be anything. The court case was not against him. From what I understand, I thought the Holy Synod decision was to punish him because he kept the potential scandal private, and did not inform the rest of the clergy. Maybe they punished him for having an inappropriate relationship, but they themselves found no proof of an affair (which would explain why they did not defrock him). Or maybe they knew that if he went unpunished, there would be a rift in our community. I could be wrong. Again, I don't speak for the Synod. I only speak for what I myself read according to the courts.The same holds true for what the former Bishop has been saying. I read what I read, and I suggest everyone else read it. If he said one thing in 2002, and now says another, then I am not the one with the contradictions. He is. Based on what I've seen of him, I wouldn't put it past him.
Hope that helps!
| |
Bet-Nahrain Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.